隐私权与新闻自由（中）

注释:
  [66] NJW 2004, 2647 (2648).
 
  [67] Markesinis/Deakin, Tort Law, 5th edition 2003, pp. 696-700.
 
  [68] 注意这只是学理上的概括，并不是英国法实际的类型划分。
 
  [69] 英国曾有两个案件，一个是气球飞过土地上空（Pickering v. Rudd (1815) 4 Camp. 219 ），一个是飞机飞过土地上空，并给原告的房子拍了照（Bernstein v. Sky News Ltd. [1978] QB 479）。在这两个案例中，法官都裁决认为并未构成侵入，因而也未侵犯原告隐私。转引自：Sir Brian Neill, Privacy: A Challenge for the Next Century, in: Basil S. Markesinis (Editor), Protecting Privacy, Oxford University Press 1999, p. 5.
 
  [70] Sir Brian Neill（前引文）, p. 6.
 
  [71] Sir Brian Neill（前引文）, p. 7-8.
 
  [72] EC Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC).
 
  [73] Markesinis/Deakin, Tort Law, 5th edition 2003, p. 701.
 
  [74] “This is by far the most dificult, though the most common, category of invasion of privacy and the one that brings out most clearly the clash of one person’s right to be left alone versus another person’s right to be informed.” Markesinis/Deakin, Tort Law, 5th edition 2003, p. 704.
 
  [75] Francis Gurry, Breach of Confidence, Clarendon Press (Oxford), Oxford University Press (New York), 1984.
 
  [76] Markesinis/Deakin, Tort Law, 5th edition 2003, p. 705-06.
 
  [77] 如英国的（新闻投诉委员会）Press Complaint Commission在黛安娜王妃去世后修订的行业规范关于隐私保护方面的内容是：1. Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and family life, home, health and correspondence. A publication will be expected to justify intrusions into any individual’s private life without consent. 2. The use of long lens photography to take pictures of people in private places is unacceptable. Note—Private places are public or private property where there is a reasonable expection of privacy. 参见：http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/cop.asp (last visit: 2004-11-3).
 
  [78] “In recent years, however, there have benn two developments of the law of confidence, typical of the capacity of the common law to adapt itself to the needs of contemporary life. One has been an acknowledgement of the artificiality of distinguishing between confidential information obtained through the violation of a confidential relationship and similar information obtained in some other way. The second has been the acceptance, under the influence of human rights instruments such as article 8 of the European Convention, of the privacy of personal information as something worthy of protection in its own right.” Campell v. MGN Limited (Decision House of Lords May 6, 2004), Paragraph 46 (by Lord Hoffmann), see IIC 2004, 737.
 
  [79] Campell v. MGN Limited (Decision House of Lords May 6, 2004), Paragraph 51-52 (by Lord Hoffmann), IIC 2004, p. 738; see also Douglas v. Hello! Ltd [2001] QB 967, 1001 (IIC 2003, 337).
 
  [80] Campell v. MGN Limited, Paragraph 82 (by Lord Hope), IIC 2004, p. 741.
 
  [81] 本案中《镜报》的报道包含下列内容：（1）坎贝尔吸毒的事实；（2）她因为有毒瘾正在接受治疗的事实；（3）她所接受的治疗是由Narcotics Anonymous提供的；（4）治疗的细节，包括多长、多频繁、一天中的哪些时间、治疗的方式、坎贝尔的投入程度等；（5）照片。参见：Campell v. MGN Limited, Paragraph 88 (by Lord Hope), IIC 2004, p. 741.
 
  [82] Clayton/Tomlinson, The Law of Human Rights, Oxford University Press 2000, paragraph 15.162.
 
  [83] Campell v. MGN Limited, Paragraph 116-121 (by Lord Hope), IIC 2004, pp. 744-745. 上议院的Hale女男爵（Baroness）也持同样的观点。参见：Paragraph 139-148, IIC 2004, pp. 747-749.
 
  [84] “The Propects for development in the near future of coherent protection for privacy in the law of torts appear bleak. Progress at the practical level of the translating concern about privacy into workable law is obstructed by an inability to solve the theoretical difficulties with the value of privacy and its relationship to other values.” Roderick Bagshaw, Obstacles on the Path to Privacy Torts, in: Peter Birks (Editor), Privacy and Loyalty, Clarendon Press 1997, p. 144.